Top 5 Postman alternatives

Top 5 Postman alternatives

Back in 2012, when Abhinav Asthana released the first version, Postman was a simple HTTP client available as a Chrome extension. Fast forward to today, Postman became a collaboration platform for API development. Postman features include but not limited to: HTTP client, tools for API testing and API monitoring, mock API servers, and documentation.

Postman offers solutions in different verticals. As a result, it attracts users with various needs. For example, if you are using Postman for API testing, we recommend you to read our best api testing tools as we have listed some of the best API testing tools in the market for you. Moreover, we wrote an in-depth article and compared Testfully as an excellent Postman alternative for API testing and monitoring.

This article lists the top 5 Postman alternatives for sending requests to different types of API, including SOAP, Restful, or GraphQL. We continue to update this article with the latest information about the offered features. Please reach out to us via our contact page for any correction or addition of a new tool.

Table of Contents


Website: insomnia.restPricing: Free, Paid plans start at $5 (per month/user)

Insomnia started as an HTTP client, just like Postman itself, and evolved to a tool for API development. It offers features including an HTTP client, automated API testing, and an Open API editor. You can send requests to both local & deployed APIs, define multiple environments, and embed environment variables to your requests. It supports XML, JSON, Form, and many other types of request payload, so it’s easy to construct any request.

Insomnina, a Postman HTTP client alternative

Insomnia Pros

  • Simple and easy-to-use UI. Unlike Postman, Insomnia offers a simple and elegant user interface.
  • Insomnia loads faster than Postman and is more responsive than Postman
  • You can organize multiple API services using collections and focus on one at a time.
  • You can embed customizable random values to your request

Insomnia Cons

  • You cannot write tests for standard requests. Testing capabilities of Insomnia are only available to Design Documents (API specs written in Open API format).


Website: | Pricing: Free, Paid plans start from $49 a month

Testfully runs in browser; no need to install any software. You can send requests to both local and deployed Restful and GraphQL APIs and inspect the response. Testfully supports Environments, Configs and allows you to embed random data in your requests. Testfully stores your requests on the cloud, and you can easily share them with your colleagues. Testfully’s API testing & monitoring features allow you to easily re-use tests and verify the correctness of your local & deployed APIs in different environments.

Testfully, a Postman alternative

Testfully’s Pros

  • It offers a free plan with unlimited team members
  • Pricing model is not based on the number of users
  • No coding is required for API validation; everyone in your team can use it
  • Supports multi-step tests, Postman only offers one-step tests
  • Collaborate with your team members through shared tests and collections
  • Supports Restful & GraphQL API
  • You can use requests for API monitoring as well

Looking for a Postman alternative?

Testfully's free plan offers Unlimited team members, Multi-step tests, team collaboration, historical test results and many more features. Import from Postman supported!

Testfully’s Cons

  • Currently, it does not support Soap APIs



Website: hoppscotch.ioPricing: Free & Open source

Hoppscotch is available via browser and does not require any account. Open, and you can start sending requests. Moreover, Hoppscotch offers dedicated UI for Restful, GraphQL, and Web socket connections. You can easily send requests to APIs in different environments using Hoppscotch’s Environment and Environment Variable feature. Hoppscotch’s approach to testing is similar to Postman and Insomnia, a simple code editor to write test cases in Javascript using Hoppscotch’s testing framework.

Hoppscotch, a Postman HTTP client alternative

Hoppscotch’s Pros

  • Dedicated GUI for Web socket allows you to send messages to Web sockets
  • Dedicated GUI for GraphQL APIs allow you to explore GraphQL schemas and send requests easily

Hoppscotch’s Cons

  • It’s still the early days of Hoppscotch, so there is not much documentation
  • While testing Hoppscotch, we noticed some bugs in UI


Website: paw.appPricing: $49

Paw was available as a Mac-only app for a long time with a $49.99 price tag. On Feb 2021, Rapid API announced that they had acquired Paw and announced the availability of cross-platform Paw applications and a new subscription-based pricing model. Out of the box, Paw does not offer many of the features that Postman offers but don’t let that disappoint you because Paw provides a range of extensions for adding new features. For example, we used a Faker.js extension to generate random data and include it in the request.

Paw, a Postman HTTP client alternative

Paw’s Pros

  • The native Mac app is fast
  • Paw is extendable using 3rd-party extensions

Paw’s Cons

  • Does not offer a free plan

Thunder Client

Website: thunderclient.ioPricing: Free

Thunder Client is a VS Code extension focusing on being a simple and efficient HTTP client while building or integrating with APIs. It supports collections as a way to group relevant requests. Moreover, ThunderClient supports the concept of Environment and Environment Variables to store and re-use values within multiple requests. Finally, ThunderClinet offers a UI that you can use to set the expected response code, response time, and response body for testing APIs.PIs.

Thunder Client, a Postman HTTP client alternative

Thunder Client’s Pros

  • It’s free

Thunder Client’s Cons

  • Only available as a VS Code extension

Comparison table

To help you make better decisions faster, We have put a list of features and their availability. You can use this table to decide what matters for you most and pick your Postman alternative.

Feature Postman Testfully Insomnia Hoppscotch Thunder Client Paw
Platform Web & Desktop Web Desktop Web VS Code Extension Web & Desktop
Free Plan Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No
Premium Plan Yes Yes Yes No No Yes
Coding Skills Required Yes No Yes Yes No No
Restful API support Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
GraphQL API support Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Soap API support Yes No Yes No Yes Yes
Request chaining No Yes No No No No
Environments Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Random Data Yes Yes Yes No No Yes
API Testing Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No
API Monitoring Yes Yes No No No No
CLI Yes Yes Yes No No No
Team Collaboration Yes Yes Yes No No No
comments powered by Disqus

Recent Articles

False positive & false negative in software testing

Exports in automated software testing have borrowed false positive and false negative terms from the medical examination field. In the medical field, the purpose of a test is to determine whether the patient has a particular medical condition or not. As far as software testing is concerned, a false positive indicates a bug when there is none. Conversely, a false negative indicates no bug when there is one.

A guide to smoke testing

Smoke testing is a software development process where a sufficient amount of code is written for a product to function enough to test the basic functionality of the product. It is a type of rudimentary software testing and, when used in web development processes, a type of black-box testing. This post is about smoke testing. What is it? Why do we need it? How to do it? You’ll find the answers here.

A guide to API health check

At its core, the API health check is an API monitoring method that checks your API and alerts you when it notices something’s amiss. Consider it a diagnostic tool for your codebase that can help you find problems before they become more significant headaches than they need to be.